FOR TS CONDUCTOR

All target accounts

SCE Pardee to Santa Clara 230 kV

A roughly 40 mile HTLS concept where cost escalation scrutiny creates room for a structure avoidance argument.

PURSUE / QUALIFYScore: 84 of 100Confidence: Medium

Evidence chain

  1. 1
    SCE's SB1006 advanced conductors and grid enhancing technologies study describes roughly 40 miles of HTLS reconductoring with a 2,180 A emergency rating target, including replacement of four 1,200 A disconnects at Santa Clara with 3,000 A equipment.
  2. 2
    Later stakeholder materials show significant cost escalation and cost transparency scrutiny, which puts the proposed approach and its structural modification scope in play.
  3. 3
    Conductor achieving the required emergency rating with reduced structural modification, supported by line specific installed cost analysis.
  4. 4
    Yes at the concept stage. There is no approved project and no procurement, so the evaluation basis is still being formed.
  5. 5
    Prepare a line specific installed cost and structure modification comparison and hold it ready for the next scope discussion.
  6. 6
    SCE transmission planning and engineering.
  7. 7
    Whether the concept advances at all, and under what scope and cost assumptions, is unresolved.
  8. 8

Score breakdown

Policy, regulatory or planning trigger17 / 20
Commercial exposure17 / 20
TS technical fit18 / 20
Timing and influenceability11 / 15
Economic, ROW or structure pressure9 / 10
Buyer accessibility4 / 5
Evidence quality8 / 10
84 / 100
SCE | California
PREPARE / QUALIFY
SB1006 planning concept
HTLS assumed in concept, brand open
Installed cost competition against HTLS
Positioning before scope hardens costs little and cannot be done later.

Required caution

This is a proposal from SCE's SB1006 work, not a confirmed Board approved CAISO project by that name.

Evidence labels

Confirmed factPolicySight assessment

A high score supports commercial diligence. It does not indicate an open procurement or an established supplier decision.