Target 12 of 15 | SCE | California
SCE Julian Hinds to Mirage 230 kV
Technically well suited and commercially inactive. A 47 mile HTLS project that CAISO placed on hold after cost escalation.
Evidence chain
- 1
Policy, planning or funding trigger
CAISO documentation describes a 47 mile HTLS reconductoring project and reports cost rising from $76M to $178M, with the project on hold. - 2
Why this project is exposed
Cost escalation of this size is exactly the condition under which a rescope can revisit conductor and structure assumptions, but only if the project resumes. - 3
Relevant TS capability
High capacity conductor with favorable weight and sag behavior for long spans and reduced structure modification. - 4
Is specification still influenceable?
Not currently. The specification question only reopens if CAISO releases the hold or a rescope is initiated. - 5
Recommended commercial action
Monitor for release of the hold or a rescope, and hold a cost reduction analysis ready rather than pursuing actively. - 6
Likely buyer
SCE transmission planning and engineering, subject to CAISO status. - 7
Key uncertainty
Whether and when the project resumes, and in what form, is unknown. - 8
Primary evidence
- CAISO Board Approved 2025 to 2026 Transmission PlanISO planning document
- SCE SB1006 Advanced Conductors and Grid Enhancing Technologies StudyUtility filing
Score breakdown
Procedural override: do not forecast
CAISO placed the project on hold after the estimate rose from $76M to $178M. That procedural status overrides the numeric score of 77. This is not an active procurement and it must not be forecast.
Utility and jurisdiction
Opportunity posture
Project stage
Specification status
Best fit TS capability
Why now
Evidence labels
A high score supports commercial diligence. It does not indicate an open procurement or an established supplier decision.